State v. Cates

The defendant, Kenneth Cates, was found guilty by a jury of aiding and abetting a burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes *617§§ 53a-8 and SSa-lOS,1 and of larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 1981) § 53a-123.2 On appeal, he contends (1) that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress certain evidence, (2) that the count of the information charging him with larceny lacked specificity and therefore did not give him adequate notice of the charge against him, and (3) that the evidence was insufficient to establish his guilt on…