Legal Opinion

Russell v. Hubbard

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox county; 'the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thornton

On the 1st day of February, 1860, Furry, since deceased, conveyed to appellees a lot of ground, and the deed contained the following special covenant: “ Whereas, the building located on the premises hereby conveyed, is adjoining and attached to a brick building, formerly owned by Daniel Harman, and the north wall thereof being used as the south wall of the building hereby conveyed, the said party of the first part hereby expressly covenants, to and with the said party of the second part, to indemnify, protect and save harmless from all injury, loss or damages, from the connection of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Judy v. KelleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  2. Rerick v. KernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1826
  3. Peacock v. HavenIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Rowan v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Pufahl v. Estate of ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Cary Hardware Co. v. McCartyColorado Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Greenwood Lake & Port Jervis Railroad v. New York & Greenwood Lake RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Metcalf v. HartWyoming Supreme Court · 1891

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API