Legal Opinion

Rhyne v. Manchester Assurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Fri'or from the District Court of Blaine County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion, of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

The plaintiff in error Ehyne brought his action in the probate court of Blaine county against the defendant in error to recover the sum of twenty-four dollars and accumulated interest, alleged to be due for part of a return premium on a policy of insurance. A summons was issued and the sheriff’s return recites that it was served upon the company’s agent at Watonga. The company appeared and filed a demurrer to the bill of particulars upon two grounds: first, that the bill of particulars did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Baizer v. LaschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Myers v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Kane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  5. Goodwine v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Howard v. ArkansawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Spivey & McGill v. NixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Hamilton v. BrowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Fehr v. Black Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Pine v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API