Rhyne v. Manchester Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Fri'or from the District Court of Blaine County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion, of the court by
Burford, C. J.:
The plaintiff in error Ehyne brought his action in the probate court of Blaine county against the defendant in error to recover the sum of twenty-four dollars and accumulated interest, alleged to be due for part of a return premium on a policy of insurance. A summons was issued and the sheriff’s return recites that it was served upon the company’s agent at Watonga. The company appeared and filed a demurrer to the bill of particulars upon two grounds: first, that the bill of particulars did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Baizer v. LaschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
- Myers v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Kane v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Goodwine v. BarnettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howard v. ArkansawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Spivey & McGill v. NixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Hamilton v. BrowderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Fehr v. Black Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Pine v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.