Legal Opinion

Galveston,Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Still

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar County. Tried below before Hon. Edward Dwyer.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

Appellee Still was the conductor of one of appellant’s work or gravel trains and sued for damages alleged to have been sustained by injury due to the fault of a brakeman, who negligently threw the switch before the tender of the engine had entirely passed over it, thereby causing the tender to be derailed and a collision between it and the following car upon which appellee was riding.

The answer was a general denial; that appellee was appellant’s vice-principal in control of the train and the work being done and of the crew; that appellee was guilty of contributory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smyth v. CaswellTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. EngelhornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Gulf, Western Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RyanTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. San Antonio Brewing Ass'n v. WolfshohlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. WylieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API