Legal Opinion
Federated Rural Electric Insurance v. Kootenai Electric Cooperative
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 13, 1993No. 91-4083-R to 91-4098-RPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, Senior District Judge.
These eases have been consolidated for pretrial purposes and are currently before the court upon motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court shall grant the motions to dismiss because plaintiff has failed to establish that defendants have purposefully maintained the minimum contacts with Kansas to satisfy the constitutional requirements for the exercise of specific or general jurisdiction over defendants.
Plaintiff is an insurance company which specializes in providing insurance for rural electric and telephone cooperatives…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Federated Rural Electric Insurance Corporation v. Kootenai Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Armbrister v. Roland International Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1987
- Packerware Corp. v. B & R PLASTICS, INC.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Dazey Corp. v. WolfmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Whittaker v. Medical Mutual of OhioDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.