Legal Opinion

Dazey Corp. v. Wolfman

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 19, 1996No. Civil Action 96-2103-GTVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN BEBBER, Chief Judge.

This diversity ease is before the court upon defendant Jeffrey Wolfinan’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction (Doc. 21). For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied.

Background

The complaint, affidavits, and other submitted documents provide the basis for the following facts and allegations. Dazey Corporation, a Kansas corporation located in New Century, Kansas, manufactures small household appliances. In early 1995, Dazey consulted with Michael J. Siegel of VITT Media to arrange a barter of its merchandise in exchange for…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Merriman v. Crompton Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. Thermal Components Company v. GriffithDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
  3. Sunlight Saunas, Inc. v. Sundance Sauna, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  4. Patriot Systems, Inc. v. C-Cubed Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1998
  5. Maverick Paper Co. v. Omaha Paper Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API