Binswanger v. Hyman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 441, Jan. T., 1921, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., June T., 1920, No. 9354, on bill in equity, in case of Olga L. Binswanger v. Edna D. Hyman. Bill in equity for injunction. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court entered a decree awarding an injunction. Defendant appealed. Error assigned, among others, was decree, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sadler,
Anthony Zane owned a tract of ground in the City of Philadelphia, through which Park Avenue ran. He laid it out in building lots, and on each side of the street erected fifteen dwellings, all having three stories and a front porch. The parties to the present proceeding became owners of certain of these houses through conveyances which contain the following reservation: “That no building or any porch in front of the same erected upon the lot of ground above described shall extend eastward further than the lines established for the same by the building and porch now…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McConville v. InghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Crofton v. St. Clement's ChurchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Murphy v. AhlbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Meigs v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Ogontz Land & Improvement Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Henry v. EvesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Easton v. KochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Wimer v. YellinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Bagiano v. HarrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- McDermott v. WilsonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.