Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Duddles

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1973No. Docket 13649PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a dispute concerning a boundary line and adverse possession. Any action against defendants Spooner is not involved in this appeal.

Plaintiff is the owner of Lot 22, River Bend Bluffs Plat, Mecosta County, by virtue of a warranty deed dated March 10, 1958. Defendants Duddles are owners of Lot 21 in said plat. In a claim that the Duddles are encroaching on his Lot 22, plaintiff seeks to enjoin such encroachment. Defendants Duddles claim they own the land in dispute by right of adverse possession. A rough diagram copied from defendants’ Exhibit A indicates the source of the trouble:

Plainti…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gailitis v. BassettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Tait v. RossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Hughson v. O'REILLYMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Colonial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wanha v. LongNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Caywood v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Emmons v. EasterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Hudson v. MaherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API