Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Crown Drug Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1959No. 41,456PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Robb, J.:

Appellants, respondents, appeal from an award in favor of appellee, claimant, and the computation thereof, by the trial court in an action under the workmen’s compensation act.

Claimant filed a cross-appeal that has since been abandoned and the merits thereof need not be herein discussed. ,

The record discloses an abundance of substantial evidence adduced on behalf of both respondents and claimant. However, a brief statement of the facts will be sufficient for the purposes of determining this appeal.

Claimant was regularly employed by the Crown…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foster v. City of AugustaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Rhea v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. McKinney v. Rodney Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Applehans v. ButnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  2. Dunlap v. Crown Drug Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API