Legal Opinion
Rutland v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided February 2, 1943No. 6 Div. 960PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Judge.
The conviction was for petit larceny. The defendant did not testify. There was uncontroverted evidence that he confessed his guilt to the police officers. After conviction, he requested probation which was denied. In the report of the probation officer, the following appears:
“This man has been working at the Birmingham Trunk Factory for about 14 years. During 1939 and 1940, he systematically stole merchandise from his employer, mainly concealing smaller articles in larger trunks and luggage. Kte then disposed of this merchandise at bargain prices.
“Subject admits that he took…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Johnson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Coates v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
- Hunter v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
- Snider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Edgil v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
- Melson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.