Legal Opinion

The B.V.D. Licensing Corporation v. Body Action Design, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 28, 1988No. 87-1646PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Circuit Judge.

The July 2, 1987, decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board) dismissing opposition No. 72,022 to the registration of the mark shown below as a trademark for “men’s, women’s and children’s clothing — namely, *728blouses, pants, jackets, dresses, shirts, undergarments, socks and footwear,” application Serial No. 493,403, filed August 6, 1984, claiming first use on July 5, 1984, is affirmed.

BAD

Opposer, The B.V.D. Licensing Corporation, relies on its ownership and use of its unquestionably famous trademark B.V.D. or BVD, many times…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Coca-Cola Company v. Gemini Rising, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  3. Gulf States Paper Corp. v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  2. Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Packard Press, Inc.(formerly Packquisition Corporation),appellant v. Hewlett-Packard Company,appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  4. Girl Scouts of the United States v. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  5. Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, Aventisub LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API