Legal Opinion

Clark v. Ingram

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1935No. 8 Div. 632PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Complainants seek the enforcement of their statutory lien as-mechanics and materialmen on a certain two-story dwelling erected on lot 10, block 5, city of Tuseumbia. Their labor and material were supplied under contract with one Howard, purchaser of the lot under written contract with defendant Clark, paying $50 cash, and who was placed in possession of the lot by said defendant. There were deferred payments, one of $50 falling due July 20, 1927, on which Howard defaulted. But Clark did not treat the contract at an end, as therein provided. On the contrary, he permitted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Isom v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Baker Sand & Gravel Co. v. Rogers Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Forrester v. GranberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Ingram v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Grayson v. GoolsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cady v. KerrWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Staley v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  3. Creson v. MainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API