Legal Opinion

Sisario v. Amsterdam Memorial Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.

Plaintiff commenced this medical malpractice action in 1987 against, among others, defendants Amsterdam Memorial Hospital and Roger Miller (hereinafter collectively referred to as defendants). Following joinder of issue, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint principally due to plaintiff’s failure to comply with CPLR 3012-a, which requires a complaint in a medical malpractice suit to be accompanied by a certificate of merit. Supreme Court only conditionally granted defendants’ motions. To avoid dismissal, the court ordered plaintiff to, within 30 days of its order, file a certificate of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New York State Clinical Laboratory Ass'n v. KaladjianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Helgans v. PluradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Rabinovich v. Maimonides Med. Ctr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  4. Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. MatamoroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  5. Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB v. MatamoroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API