Legal Opinion

Garratt-Callahan Co. v. Yost

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

Plaintiff is here attempting to enforce a restrictive covenant in an employment contract. Defendant was first employed as a “trainee salesman” by plaintiff in 1959. Later defendant signed a written contract which imposed the restriction that he would not engage in any competitive employment for a period of two years after his employment with plaintiff should terminate. The trial court held the contract to be unenforceable. Plaintiff appeals.

We have concluded that for all practicable purposes, the case is moot and we need not review the legal and factual problems presented. The covenant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wiegand v. WestOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Smith v. SMITHOregon Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ocean Beauty Seafoods, LLC v. Pacific Seafood Group Acquisition Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Bates v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Tvko v. HowlandOregon Tax Court · 2001
  4. Inventory Auditors, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. Northwest Reforestation Contractors Ass'n v. Summitt Forests, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API