Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Northwest Reforestation Contractors Ass'n v. Summitt Forests, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 1996No. 16-93-09532; CA A86294Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWarren, J.

Although I concur in much of the majority’s opinion, I cannot join in its misreading of ORS 658.475 to deny plaintiffs a claim for damages. The majority effectively guts the statute by giving reforestation contractors a foolproof method for avoiding private actions for their violations of the Farm Labor Contractors Act. All a contractor now has to do is to suspend its violations before a private party actually files a lawsuit. The contractor will then be free, once the trial court dismisses the private action, to resume its violations until the next lawsuit threatens. It will never risk an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Papadopoulos v. Oregon State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Simpson v. First Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Micelli v. AndrusOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Bernard v. Willamette Box & Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Fisk v. LeithOregon Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API