Legal Opinion

State v. Palmer

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 29, 2003No. AC 22713PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The defendant, David L. Palmer, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of attempt to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 and 53a-134 (a) (4).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court permitted the prosecutor to make certain improper remarks during his closing and rebuttal arguments to the jury, which, when taken together, denied the defendant his due process right to a fair trial under our federal and state constitutions.2 We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  3. State v. PounceySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. State v. MorganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. State v. ParrottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HolleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. State v. Felix R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  3. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API