Legal Opinion

Omni Group Farms, Inc. v. County of Cayuga

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We agree with plaintiffs that an action against a municipality for a violation of civil rights under 42 USC § 1983 does not require the filing of a notice of claim (see, Felder v Casey, 487 US 131). The allegations in the instant complaint, however, are too vague and conclusory to plead a cognizable claim under 42 USC § 1983 (see, Alfaro Motors v Ward, 814 F2d 883, 887).

Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim for the causes of action for money damages was properly denied (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]). The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peek v. Williamsville Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Harris v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Jalloh v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Fuller v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API