Jeannine Tumminaro v. Michael Astru
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Jeannine Tumminaro had been disabled by chronic back pain but after four years showed “medical improvement” and returned to full-time work. A period of disability ends if the claimant shows medical improvement or engages in substantial gainful activity, but Tumminaro argues that the ALJ’s finding of medical improvement is not supported by substantial evidence. Tumminaro further argues that her renewed employment (which appears to be ongoing) was not an independent basis for declaring that her disability had ended because the ALJ never evaluated…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lingenfelter v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ronald E. Veino, Sr. v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Spiva v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Getch v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Alvarado v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Cooper v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2017
- Ammons-Lewis v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- ABBOTT v. KIJAKAZIDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
- Abraham v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.