Legal Opinion
Dan Nichols v. Jack McCormick Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 8, 1991No. 90-35416Published
1Opinion of the Court
946 F.2d 695
Dan NICHOLS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Jack McCORMICK, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 90-35416.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 8, 1991.
Wendy Holton, Helena, Mont., for petitioner-appellant.
Elizabeth S. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Helena, Mont., for respondent-appellee.
Before BROWNING, WRIGHT and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.ORDER
1
The panel has voted to deny appellant's petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
2
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter…
Also in this document: Dissent · Norris; Dissent · Norris.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.