Fremont State Bank v. Vincent
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered February 25, 1920, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to enforce the superadded liability of a stockholder of an insolvent hank, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiff, hank examiner, commenced this action in the superior court for King county, seeking recovery from the defendant, Vincent, upon his constitutional superadded liability as a stockholder of the plaintiff bank, for the benefit of its creditors. Trial upon the merits in the superior court, sitting without a jury, resulted -in findings and judgment in favor of the bank examiner, from which the defendant has appealed to this court.
The controlling facts, as we view them, are not in dispute, and may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff bank was at all times in question, up until…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilson v. BookWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Hanson v. SoderbergWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Dunn v. Bank of UnionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
- Shuey v. HolmesWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Seymour v. Bank of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
3Cited by6 opinions
- Duke v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Dempster v. AtwoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Luikart v. SchmidtNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Luikart v. SchmidtNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. McCollumWashington Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.