Legal Opinion
Amaro v. Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 18, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00382Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAFAEL MARQUEZ AMARO; JAVIER Case No. 1:21-cv-00382-JLT-HBK BARRERA, on behalf of themselves and 12 others similarly situated, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND ORDER DENYING 14 v. MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE 15 BEE SWEET CITRUS, INC.; and DOES 1 (Doc. 4; Doc. 12) through 10, inclusive, 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court are (1) Bee Sweet Citrus, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the complaint under 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) or 12(f), or in the alternative motion for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pierce v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Kohn Law Group, Inc. v. Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- In Re Adams Apple, Inc., Debtor. Robert C. Burchinal, Donald G. Ott, Meton G. Raine, Karen O. Raine, John Ruud, Richard H. Mason, Phyllis Mason, Richard Floren, Rachel Floren, Kenneth R. Irwin, Sharon Irwin, Richard J. Willsey and Cheri Ann Willsey, Plaintiffs v. Central Washington Bank, Bank of California v. Central Washington BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Avi Nakash, Joe Nakash, and Ralph Nakash v. Georges Marciano, Maurice Marciano, Armand Marciano, Paul MarcianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.