Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Bailey

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1944No. Civ. No. 3281PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

In an action to quiet title, containing the usual allegations, plaintiffs alleged that on April 22, 1940, they were the owners of certain property in San Bernardino County and that defendants claimed an interest therein adverse to theirs, and sought to have plaintiffs’ title quieted. The approved bill of exceptions shows that on April 22, 1940, plaintiffs entered into a written agreement for the sale of the property to defendants for $2,500, to be paid as follows: Defendants to pay $300 on signing the contract; $200 was to be paid in escrow, which escrow was to “start” not later than January…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cavanaugh v. CasselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Reed v. HickeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. Cohn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grubb & Ellis Co. v. BelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API