Legal Opinion · Dissent

Helsel v. Noellsch

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 17, 2003No. SC 85053Published

1DissentDuane Benton, Judge

The common law consistently compensates for interference with the marriage *234relation — “loss of consortium.” Loss of consortium is the second of three elements in an alienation of affection claim. Gibson v. Frowein, 400 S.W.2d 418, 421 (Mo. banc 1966). “The foundation of a cause of action for alienation of affection is the loss of consortium.” Kraus v. Kraus, 693 S.W.2d 869, 873 (Mo.App.1985).

In tort cases where a spouse is injured, the other spouse often has a separate claim for loss of consortium. Powell v. American Motors Corp., 834 S.W.2d 184, 188 (Mo. banc 1992). Most of these losses are…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strock v. PressnellOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Novak v. Kansas City Transit, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Weicker v. WeickerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Thornburg v. Federal Express Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API