Legal Opinion
United States v. Van Horn
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 14, 2002No. 00-2275PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Kenneth Van Horn was convicted of being a felon in possession of explosives, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 842(i)(l). On appeal, Van Horn challenges his conviction on two grounds. First, Van Horn argues that the evidence presented at trial fails to demonstrate his knowing possession of explosives as required under § 842(i)(l) and is thus insufficient to support his conviction. Second, he asserts that the trial judge erroneously admitted evidence of details of Van Horn’s prior uncharged misconduct relating to his involvement in a burglary of an explosives depot in 1993.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. GendronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. PierroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. VaroudakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Eusebio Escobar-De JesusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. LucianoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Manuel GunnCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Luis MercadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. McLeanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.