Legal Opinion · Dissent

Feldman v. Hoffman

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 2014Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION BY

President Judge PELLEGRINI.

I respectfully dissent because we have no authority to overrule the express provisions of the Rules of Civil Procedure.

There is no dispute that immunity is an affirmative defense. The question here is whether it can be raised in a preliminary objection or as New Matter. The Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure are clear that as an affirmative defense, immunity must be raised in an Answer under New Matter, not as a preliminary objection. Pa. R.C.P. No. 1030 provides:(a) Except as provided by subdivision(b), all affirmative defenses including but…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Womer v. HillikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Freach v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Richmond v. McHaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. R.H.S. v. Allegheny County Department of Human ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Sweeney v. Merrymead Farm, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API