Legal Opinion
Holloway v. Schott
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 28, 1953PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DREW, Justice.
The liquor license of appellant was suspended pursuant to the provisions of Section 561.291, Florida Statutes 1951, F.S.A. The suspension took place a few days after the telephone in appellant’s place of business was removed pursuant to the request of tlie Attorney General of Florida and in accordance with the regulation of the Florida Railroad and Public Utilities Commission; which we upheld in Dade County News Dealers Supply Co. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., Fla., 48 So.2d 89, 90. In this case we said:
“The first point for consideration is whether or not appellee, Southern…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- National Contracting Co. v. Hudson River Water Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1908
- State v. VocelleSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- McBride v. Western Union Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Blum v. Ford, Commissioner of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kline v. State Beverage Department of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
- Astral Liquors, Inc. v. State, Dept. of Bus. Reg.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Carbo, Inc. v. MeiklejohnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Crane v. Department of State, Division of LicensingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- SOUTHERN BT & T. CO. v. Nineteen Hundred One C. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.