Legal Opinion
Peterson v. BASF Corp.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 30, 2006No. C3-02-857PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Chief Justice.
In February 2004, we affirmed the judgment for respondents Ronald Peterson, et al., in this class action against appellant BASF Corporation for violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (“NJCFA”), N.J. Stat. Ann. §§ 56:8-1 to - 106 (West 2001), in BASF’s marketing and advertising of its herbicides Poast and Poast Plus. Peterson v. BASF Corp., 675 N.W.2d 57 (Minn.2004) (“Peterson III”). BASF petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. In an order filed May 2, 2005, the Court granted the writ of certiorari, vacated the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Malone v. White Motor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hapka v. Paquin FarmsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Engquist v. LoyasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Jane Doe 136 v. Ralph LiebschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.