Dunn v. Wade
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to St. Louis Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRylaND, Judge
The amended petition of the plaintiff alleges that David ' Runnion made his certain promissory note, dated May 23d, *2081854, and thereby promised, ninety days after date, to pay to the order of John Dnnn (the plaintiff') twenty-five hundred dollars, negotiable at the bank of the state of Missouri, without defalcation or discount; that said note was endorsed by the said John Dunn and William Wade, as co-securities ; and that said note was an accommodation note, endorsed as aforesaid for the accommodation of the said David Runnion, who procured said endorsement solely for the purpose of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- McCune v. BeltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Spragins v. McCalebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Montgomery v. PageOregon Supreme Court · 1896