Lopez v. State

OPINION

YOUNG, Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction of burglary of a building, enhanced by two prior felony convictions. After trial by jury, punishment was assessed by the trial court at imprisonment for life. We affirm.

In his first two grounds of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. He first contends that the State failed to prove that appellant had recent unexplained possession of the property taken during the burglary. We note at the outset that even though this is a circumstantial evidence case we will uphold the conviction if any rational trier of fact…