Legal Opinion

Leggett v. Firth

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from special term, Kings county. Action by Eliza Leggett against Christopher C. Firth. The complaint was •dismissed at the trial, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

This is an action for the specific performance of a contract in writing for the conveyance of real property. The plaintiff in the action claimed to be the owner of the premises involved, and entered into a written agreement to sell and convey the same to the defendant, who agreed to purchase, but who subsequently refused to consummate the agreement under an apprehension of a defect in the title, based upon the folio wing facts: In the year 1857 ■one John Francis Flazzelarddied seised and possessed of the premises, leaving a wife, three minor children, and leaving a last will and testament,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roseboom v. . RoseboomNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Terry v. . WigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Van Horne v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Campbell v. . BeaumontNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Jackson v. SebringNew York Supreme Court · 1819

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rice v. TylerNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  2. In re BearseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. In re the Final Accounting of De Witt GardnerNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Gilbert & GilbertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1890
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of MillardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API