Legal Opinion

MASTROCESARE v. SAUL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00347Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALBERT JOHN MASTROCESARE, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 20-347 ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2021, having considered the parties’ motions for summary judgment and reviewed the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) final decision denying Plaintiff’s applications for benefits under the Social Security Act (“Act”), the Court will affirm that decision.1 Substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API