Legal Opinion

J.G. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 6, 1989No. 88-1038PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

J.G. appeals the adjudication of delinquency for burglary of a structure, grand theft, and criminal mischief. We hold that the erroneous admission of the officer’s hearsay testimony which presented “the inescapable inference ... that a non-testifying witness [had] furnished the police with evidence of the defendant’s guilt....” Molina v. State, 406 So.2d 57 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (quoting Postell v. State, 398 So.2d 851, 854 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 411 So.2d 384 (Fla.1981)), constituted harmless error under the circumstances of this case. Hill v. State, 459 So.2d 434 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Postell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Molina v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. F.W. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. D.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. J.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. DL v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. JO v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API