D.L. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
D.L., a juvenile, appeals an adjudication of delinquency predicated on grand theft. § 812.014(2)(c)(l), Fla.Stat. (Supp.1986). D.L. contends that the evidence supports, at most, an adjudication of delinquency for petit theft, rather than grand theft. We agree and reverse. The state did not present evidence that the market value of the stolen property at the time of the theft was at least $300; it presented evidence only as to the retail cost of the stolen property one year prior to the theft. See Negron v. State, 306 So.2d 104 (Fla.1974), receded from on other grounds, Butterworth v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Butterworth in and for Broward Cty. v. FluellenSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Negron v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- In Interest of FRDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Beasley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bloodsaw v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- J.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Dumervil v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- DL v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.