Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Cunningham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1924No. 6 Div. 349PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The plaintiff: in the court below (petitioner here), on September 8, 1922, filed his suit in the circuit court of Jefferson county in assumpsit against Ewart-. Brewer Motor Company, a corporation, ■■ claiming $1,000 damages for a breach of. warranty in the sale of an automobile, and,, as a part of the complaint served on the defendant named, noted a demand for a jury trial, as required by Acts 1915, p. 824. On November 17, 1922, there appearing no appearance or pleading on the part of defendant, plaintiff, by leave of the court, withdrew demand for a jury trial and also by leave of the court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ingram v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Florida Nursery & Trading Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Phillips, Goldsby & Blevins v. Beene's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1862
  4. Falley v. FalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. McDonald v. CawhornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ewart v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Melbourne State Bank v. WrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Grigsby v. LilesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  4. Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Mills v. Union Springs Guano Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. GayAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API