Legal Opinion

Arunachalam v. IBM

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 1, 2021No. 20-1493PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case: 20-1493 Document: 64 Page: 1 Filed: 03/01/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, Plaintiff-Appellant v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, SAP AMERICA, INC., JPMORGAN CHASE & CO., Defendants-Appellees DOES 1-100, Defendant ______________________ 2020-1493 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:16-cv-00281-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews. ______________________ Decided: March 1, 2021 ______________________ LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, Menlo Park, CA, pro se.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. James C. DunkelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Jerry F. Connell, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. DVACourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
  2. Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
  3. Arunachalam v. GordonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
  4. Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  5. Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API