Legal Opinion

Robbins v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 2, 1922No. 5705PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCotteral, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). A primary convention of the appellant is that Congress has not asserted any proprietary control over the highways in this park, therefore the regulations if applicable to him are without legislative authority. The original act (Act Jan. 26, 1915, 38 Stat. 798) reserves and dedicates a tract within certain boundaries as the Rocky Mountain National Park. Section 2 excepts:

“Any valid existing claim, location or entry under the land laws of the United States, whether for homestead, mineral, right of way, or any other purpose whatsoever, or shall alfect the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re DebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Kansas v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Colorado v. TollSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. U. S. Klans, Knights of Ku Klux Klan, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1961
  3. United States v. Brand Jewelers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  4. Wilkenson v. Dept. of Interior of United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1986
  5. Perko v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API