Legal Opinion

Hiram Lodge No. 18 v. Cox

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1932No. Docket No. 8153PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPPAAN J., pro tem.

At the time this matter was first presented to the superior court, upon the petition of Hiram and Jackson lodges, praying distribution to them of the residue of the estate of Gary Wirt, the heirs at law of said deceased appeared and filed their contest and objection to such distribution, alleging as the sole ground of such contest “that the bequest in the will of said deceased was and is void under the provisions of article XX, section 9, of the Constitution of the state of California”. The trial court heard the contest and decided that the bequest to the petitioning…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ellert v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Estate of SutroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In Re Estate of UphamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. In Re the Estate of PeabodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. In Re the Estate of ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Pioneer Society v. Historical SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. La Societe Francaise De Bienfaisance Mutuelle v. California EmploymentCommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Estate of CulverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Estate of AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Lynch v. Surprise Valley Lodge No. 235California Court of Appeal · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API