Legal Opinion

Succession of Fox

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1842PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Gourt of Probates of New Orleans, Bermu-dez, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.

The petitioner sues to recover of the estate of Ber*300nard Fox the sum of thirteen hundred and twenty dollars, which he alleges is due to him for his services as a laborer and drayman for two years preceding the death of Fox, according to an account annexed to his petition. After an exception touching the sufficiency of the petition, which we think was correctly overruled, the respondent answered to the inerts, by denying any settlement of accounts between the deceased and the petitioner, admitting her quality of executrix, and generally denying the facts and allegations in the petition.

There…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bodenheimer v. Executors of BodenheimerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. Succession of Sinnot v. Hibernia National BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  3. Succession of RageurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Beard v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  5. Demarets v. DemaretsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API