Legal Opinion

Succession of Rageur

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 5, 1923No. 25211PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

This case involves only a question of fact. The deceased was 83 years of age and had never married. He left an estate aggregating over $90,000, out of which he willed some $36,000 in special legacies, including a legacy of $14,000 to one, J. O. Blanchet, whom he named as his executor. The balance he left to his brother, Laurent Rageur.

Included in the inventory of his estate was a mortgage note for $7,840, executed by said J. O. Blanchet, who, however, protested at the time said note did not form part of the succession, having been remitted by the deceased before his death.

This is a proceeding…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bodenheimer v. Executors of BodenheimerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. Cutler v. Successson of CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1885
  3. Succession of DasteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  4. Caldwell v. TurnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  5. Calhoun v. McKnightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Funderburk v. FunderburkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  2. Bates v. BlitzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  3. Succession of YeatesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  4. Succession of McBurneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. Succession of BroussardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API