Legal Opinion

Glens Falls Insurance v. Anness

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHyman Korn, J.

Motion for reargument granted.

Petitioner in its original application sought a stay of arbitration upon the ground that a triable issue exists as to whether claimants gave proper notice to the carrier of the alleged “ hit and run ’ ’ accident.

The court denied petitioner’s motion for a stay, primarily upon the ground that petitioner’s motion papers were not served within the 10-day limiting period contained in claimant’s original demand for arbitration (CPLR 7503, subd. [c]).

Section 7503 (subd. [c]) provides in part that an application to stay arbitration ‘ ‘ must be made by the party served…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Finest Restaurant Corp. & L & A Music Co.New York Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Insurance & GilbertNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Interstate System, Inc. v. Bev Pac, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Insurance & GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. In re the Arbitration between Sweet & Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API