Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Knickerbocker Insurance & Gilbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1970Published

1Opinion of the CourtNunez, J.

This appeal raises the question of the timely service of appellant’s application for a stay of arbitration.

It is undisputed that a notice of intention to arbitrate, conforming to the provisions of CPLR 7503 (subd. [c]), was served on petitioner on December 1,1969. The petition to stay arbitration was sent by certified mail on December 11, 1969 and was received by respondent’s attorney on December 12, 1969.

We do not reach the question as to whether service upon claimant’s attorney, if timely made, is effective to commence a proceeding to stay arbitration, since we conclude that such service…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of King v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Hurley v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Jacobs v. HookerNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Radcliff v. Van BenthuysenNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Commercial Credit Corp. v. OrnsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API