Legal Opinion

Hamlin Dev. Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 15, 1993No. Docket No. 8324-90RUnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

P, a corporation, established a pension plan in 1980. In 1983, petitioner received a favorable determination letter from respondent stating that P's pension plan was a qualified plan under sec. 401(a), I.R.C.

Read the full summary

P, a corporation, established a pension plan in 1980. In 1983, petitioner received a favorable determination letter from respondent stating that P's pension plan was a qualified plan under sec. 401(a), I.R.C. The letter also stated that respondent's determination was effective for plan years beginning after March 31, 1981. In 1990, respondent mailed petitioner a final revocation letter stating that the favorable determination letter was retroactively revoked for plan years ending on or after March 31, 1985. Respondent's given reason for this revocation was that, although petitioner allegedly…

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Hamlin Dev. Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 8324-90R

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1993-89; 1993 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 94; 65 T.C.M. (CCH) 2071;

March 15, 1993, Filed

P, a corporation, established a pension plan in 1980. In 1983, petitioner received a favorable determination letter from respondent stating that P's pension plan was a qualified plan under sec. 401(a), I.R.C. The letter also stated that respondent's determination was effective for plan years beginning after March 31, 1981. In 1990, respondent mailed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Aero Rental v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  3. B.H.W. Anesthesia Foundation, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  4. Carstenson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. Buzzetta Constr. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. JohnstonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1996
  2. Linda Call, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ameritech Management Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Linda Call, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ameritech Management Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API