Legal Opinion

Grant v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1909PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Wetzel County. Action by Arthur Grant against the Baltimore & Ohio Eail-road Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant .brings error

1Opinion of the Court

Poffenbarger, Judge:

The complaint of the Baltimore & Ohio Bailroad Company, on a writ of error to a judgment against it in favor of Arthur Grant, rendered by the circuit court of Wetzel county, in an action of debt, for the recovery of three $500.00 statutory penalties, for passenger fares, exacted or taken in excess of the rate prescribed by law, raises, among others, the following questions, as the case is disclosed by the briefs filed: (1) Whether a certain portion of chapter 54 of the Code, namely, section 82cV, constituting section 2475 of the Code of 1906, is repealed by chapter 41 of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Bartlet v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  4. State v. HardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Heckmann v. . PinkneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. General Daniel Morgan Post No. 548West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. General Daniel Morgan Post No. 548West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State ex rel. Cecil v. KnappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Taylor v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API