Legal Opinion
Moore v. District Court in & for City & Cty. of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 28, 1974No. 26138PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lee
This is an original proceeding brought pursuant to C.A.R. 21. We issued our rule to show cause why the relief prayed for in the petition should not be granted. We now make the rule absolute.
Dillon Companies, Inc., a Kansas corporation, doing business as King Soopers, Inc. (King Soopers), commenced an action in the Denver district court for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, praying that the court declare unconstitutional and restrain the enforcement of Rules 5 and 6 of section 48-1-2(d). 1 of the rules and regulations of the Colorado State Board of Pharmacy (Board), which had been…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hynes, Regional Director, Fish & Wildlife Service v. Grimes Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Colorado State Board of Optometric Examiners v. DixonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Asphalt Paving Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Public Utilities Commission v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Charnes v. LobatoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Urbish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Regular Route Common Carrier Conference of the Colorado Motor Carriers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- CF&I Steel Corp. v. Colorado Air Pollution Control CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Collopy v. Wildlife Commission, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.