Lefebvre's Admr. v. Central Vermont Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.
When this case was here before (97 Vt. 342, 123 Atl. 211) , the theory of the plaintiff was that the highway over which the decedent, Grace LeFebvre, was riding at the time ■of the collision in question at the crossing at Eiverton station was regularly laid out and four rods wide. The theory of the defendant then was that the highway there was one established by user, dedication, or adoption, and that its width was only such as had become fixed by user. At the second trial, the record of which is now before us for review, the theory of both parties was that said highway at that place was of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Menard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Slattery v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Johanson v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Barney's Admrx. v. Quaker Oats Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Healy, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
- Great Northern Casualty Co. v. McColloughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
- Canadian Pac. Ry. Co. v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Webster v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Zuverino v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928