Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Hall & Long

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 15, 1881PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Evidence. Pleadings. Bonds. Contracts. Jurisdiction. Equity; Before Judge CLARK. City Court of Atlanta. June Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Speer, Justice.

Hall & Long brought this suit against Joseph. Thompson, as security for Lovejoy, to recover of him the sum of two thousand dollars claimed to be due and payable on a bond. It was alleged that said bond was made and delivered in conformity with an order recited in the bond ; and that on the---day of Mayj 1880, in said superior court, in said cause, a verdict was had for the plaintiffs, and a final decree rendered against Lovejoy, the principafor the sum of three thousand and fifty-two dollars and ninety-three cents, with interest for the goods in said Love-joy’s possession at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cobb v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1865
  2. Stephens v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  3. Richmond v. WoodardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  4. Shaver v. McLendonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
  5. Sutton v. SuttonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Reward Ceramic Color Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Gaulding v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Parramore v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. McCorkel v. Whitten & SonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Caldwell Lumber Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API