Legal Opinion

McCorkel v. Whitten & Son

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 14, 1921No. 11837PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari; from Evans superior court — Judge Sheppard. July 19, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. Where a forthcoming bond is given in a legal proceeding wherein the plaintiffs are a partnership, the fact that the bond may erroneously recite that the plaintiff is an .individual will not authorize the individual to bring suit on- the bond, since the previous legal proceeding would afford no actual basis for the giving of such a bond.

*708Decided April 14, 1921.

2. Where, in a mortgage-foreclosure proceeding by a partnership, a claimant gives a forthcoming bond payable to the levying constable, but erroneously names an individual as the plaintiff in fi. fa. in the foreclosure proceeding, and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wall v. MountSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Gaulding v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Gelders v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Busby & Son v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. Hartshorn v. Bank of GoughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rust v. Producers Co-Operative Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  2. Ellington v. Conrad & LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Rust v. Producers Co-Operative Exchange, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API