Sanchez v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ROTHENBERG, Judge.
The defendant, Lazaro Sanchez, appeals his convictions and sentences for attempted burglary of an unoccupied structure, a CVS store, and criminal mischief of $200 or less — damage to CVS’s property. For the reasons that follow, we find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm.
The defendant raises several issues pertaining to his confession at the police station to the crimes charged, after Detective Rosario read the defendant his Miranda rights, the defendant acknowledged that he understood his rights, and he agreed to speak to Detective Rosario. In his state ment, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Czubak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Salazar v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fagan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALICIA MEDINADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020