Legal Opinion

Douglas v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 28, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1758PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORAND ÜM OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

This'matter is before the Court on the District of Columbia’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or, in the alternative, Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff Jayshawn Douglas claims that the District’s refusal to allow Mr. Douglas access to his educational placement violated the “stay-put” provision, 20 U.S.C. § 14150), of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The District moves to dismiss on the grounds that (1) this Court lacks subject matter…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  3. Coalition for Underground Expansion v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  4. Scolaro v. District of Columbia Bd. of Elections and EthicsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  5. Pearl Murphy and Theodore Murphy v. Arlington Central School District Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Q. C-C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Pinto v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. T. H. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. K.W. v. District. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  5. Brown v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API