Estate of Murray
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RACANELLI, P. J.
In this appeal we must decide whether a probate homestead in community property set aside to the surviving spouse should have been limited to a life estate. We conclude that by virtue of a recent statutory amendment, the homestead should have been so limited. We reverse with directions.
Facts
Decedent and respondent were married January 21, 1961. In 1972, during their marriage, they purchased a single-family home at 1706 El Camino Way, Santa Rosa, taking title in joint tenancy. They lived together in that house until June 13, 1979, when respondent moved out. The decedent…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estate of BaglioneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Estate of BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Taylor v. MadiganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Ferlito v. CesareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. MorganDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1982
- Liccardo v. MirabitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991